|
Excerpted from (Akita, Chihuahua, Mini-Bull, Toy Fox Terrier)
Judges’ Seminar Handbook
You should know it when you see it. Type.
Richard Beauchamp put it this way “Breed
type is such an elusive thing… It is something that can’t be taught but
it can be learned. Even when type is
present to the fullest, one person may see it and the person next to him may
see nothing at all. It is clearly
visible – yet defies description.”
You’ve had it happen as you sit ringside with a friend. You see a dog one way, they see it another because no two
dogs are identical and no two standards put equal emphasis on the same
features of type. Working breeds
may emphasize soundness whereas Toys stress esthetic beauty and Terriers want
temperament that never quits. All
are critical to Type and it is by your knowledge of Type that you will
be judged.
It is Type that you are duty-bound to protect and it is Type that you
must preserve. Have you ever thumbed through photos of dogs from say, fifty
years ago? Did Peggy Adamson’s
Dictator look like today’s Dobermans? How
closely did Saddler resemble the Fox Terrier of today?
We have to look pretty hard at the Akita of the Seventies to find one
that could win in the ring today. But
then when we look at what is winning in the ring today, we see that many judges have taken the easy way out – picking winners on soundness,
faces, advertisements, or an opportunity to advance.
They may get by, indeed, they may get a lot of assignments by making
popular decisions - but
they will never be known as great judges.
If anyone takes this personally, they should not be here. I'm nobody, just a messenger who will try to deliver
method and wisdom learned from some of the greatest judges. I will
give you Five Rules which properly used, will gain the respect of
breeders, your peers, and advance your career.
Prioritizing these rules
will protect your integrity. You will have done your job. You
will judge every dog according to the breed standard and nothing else.....
Above all, you will have clearly demonstrated your commitment to the
Standard and preservation of Breed Type. You will be a Leader.
First Things First. As a
judge, you have to quickly weigh many factors, the most important of which
is the overall health, condition, and temperament of the dog.
If it is sick, malnourished, unkempt, lame, can't be examined, or threatens to
attack, you will disqualify,
excuse, or mentally eliminate it from consideration, depending on the
situation.
The Standard. That out of the way, you will then compare each dog to the Standard.
To do so you must constantly refresh your memory on every breed you
judge because our minds play tricks on us, some of which can be embarrassing.
One judge admitted that a good friend cautioned him about awarding dogs
with a very obvious breed fault. His
friend said people had begun to talk. Re-reading
the standard, he realized that something said by a handler-friend had
seated itself into his subconscious in direct contradiction to the standard.
The judge recalled many times, when weighing a hard decision, he had
unwittingly selected for the fault instead of against it.
The best judges read the standards on a regular basis and
when in doubt, they refer to them in the ring.
Seminars. Given the
plethora of seminars and the haphazard way in which people are selected to
present, you should read the standards on a regular basis!
You should bear in mind that presenters who, having
a problem in their own breeding program, tend to over-emphasize a fault
beyond that which is conveyed by the standard, or they settled for ignoring it and consequently, tend to
minimize that fault in seminar discussions. If
you have any doubts about something said in a seminar, ask the presenter for
clarification. If still not sure, go ask two top breeders
working in two different bloodlines.
There
are judging techniques not covered by Breed Standards but which are very
important to ring craft, particularly for judges crossing over into another
Group. We will go over how to approach and "go over" this breed in the
hands-on portion today. No matter how many pages you take home today, they cannot take the
place of examining and observing real dogs.
Applying The Rule Of Fives
Okay,
here comes the difficult part of judging.
Many standards
emphasize one feature over another and that helps but what can you do
in every breed, every time, that
will earn the respect of both exhibitors and your peers? If you
recognize and select Breed Type
with unerring skill, you will become known as someone who “has an eye for a
dog” rather than a “popular judge.”
How many remember Winnie Heckman?
Phil Marsh? Peter Knoop,
Ed Bracey? Michele Billings once
admitted she was having a hard time “getting a handle” on Akitas. I suggested she talk to Roy Ayers, Virginia
Hampton, Eleanor Evers, etc. A
few years later she did the National Specialty, drawing rave reviews, even
from those who won nothing. What
higher compliment can a judge receive?
The best judges agree the following Priorities define Type
in each and every breed.
Breed
Character.
When the dog enters the ring or is undistracted by the handler, note
whether it carries itself with the correct attitude.
A Bully will bounce; an Akita is dignified, purposeful; a Chihuahua may
twirl or play; a Toy Fox will strut to the end of the lead and survey his ring.
If you don’t know how the breed should act, go visit with breeders.
If the dog acts tired, it could be the end of a long day but
if the handler can't bring the dog around by sparring, baiting, or gaiting, you
must disregard it because you are unable to assess breed character, i.e. Type.
It matters not what the reason (and handlers are full of
excuses), it is a dog show and you are to judge them on the day.
It may be a dog you adore but if it is showing badly, you will be seen as a fool if you put it up.
You judge dogs, ringside judges you.
It is a puppy? First show?
In season? Okay then be
forgiving but don’t award it. You
will be doing no favor to the breed, the handler, or your own reputation.
Even a structurally correct dog is a bad example if it fails to display proper breed character
and personality. There’s
always another day and another chance for the dog to convince another judge
that it has temperament and personality correct for its breed.
It has been said before but must be repeated here.
An Akita performing like a Minpin has a serious lack of Breed
Character. A dog that droops or is bored is something other than a
toy breed. And while a Chihuahua
may cringe back from a stranger, a terrier that does so should be mentally
eliminated. Sure there will be in-betweens but if you apply for the breed, you
should know it well enough to judge the degree of un-typical
behavior and its significance in that particular breed.
A beautiful dog that lacks character misrepresents the breed.
Therefore Character is the first Priority.
Silhouette is next on your checklist. Sure
there are some breeds with very similar outlines but you are supposed to know
the difference. Proportion, topline, angulation, tailset, ear carriage - all are distinguishing features.
If you use the ink-blot test and the dog fails, forget it. You know
why....
A Havanese is not a Lhasa even on an inkblot.
An unclipped Poodle will still have that up-on-leg “poodley” profile that separates it from the Lowchen.
If a dog in the ring makes you wonder if you would know its breed if you saw it on Park Avenue, for goodness sake, reject
it. That is after all, why the
public chooses a purebred. Silhouette
then, is Rule #2.
Head and Expression. Doesn’t
matter if it is a head breed or not, the head is what owners look at every
day. An Akita
with a GSD head cannot possibly have the intimidating expression of a
courageous hunter of bear, boar, and burglars but please, any suggestion of a
chow scowl is a serious no-no. Size
notwithstanding, a Chihuahua with Papillion skull couldn’t possibly have
those huge luminous eyes so typical of little desert dwellers.
So even if the standard fails to emphasize the head, it is
an indispensable feature of type. It
may take a keen eye to distinguish fine differences between the Toy Fox,
Toy Manchester, and Minpin head but that is the mark of a great Toy Judge.
You have a duty to know and award the dog who acts like it’s breed,
presents an easily recognizable profile, and whose head and expression define
it as such. If you are down to
the ribbon but find yourself confused by a Bullie head with a significant stop,
remember priority rule #3.
Movement -
Soundness versus Type is a worn out
debate. Everyone knows you “can
get a sound dog at the pound” so we will not repeat that discussion other
than to stress that movement is indicative of a lot more than soundness.
It clearly demonstrates Type.
In many breeds, it is the critical test of correct conformation. Should a Peke move
like a Pom? A Bullie like a
Boston? Of course not, so beyond soundness, movement exemplifies breed Type.
Please, on this one thing, do not get lazy. If the Collie moves like a Shepherd, it may be exciting
and dramatic but it is all wrong! Do not fall into
the trap of generic judging, especially as regards movement. Sure
ringside is cheering for the big moving dog. Does that make
the Clumber moving like a Cocker an outstanding dog? Do
you want to be known as a “movement judge” or as someone who “really
knows the breed.” Which is the
greater compliment? More to the point, which is more important to
preserving that breed? This is Priority #4.
Coat constitutes
an important element of type. Go
beyond the Maltese or the Old English. Sure,
they are uniquely coated, but if you really know your stuff, you know even breeds with
similar coat types have subtle but important differences.
An Akita does not have the longer flatter coat of a Malamute but
does have a stiffer, fuller coat than a Siberian.
The differences can often only be determined by touch.
(That does not mean a massage.) Reading about coat does not allow your tactile senses
to learn type. A
Mini-Bull does not have the coat of a Staffie-Bull.
Both will be short, flat, and glossy but the Bullie’s coat feels
harder because the hair shaft is slightly thicker.
While the Toy Fox Terrier’s coat looks like a Minpin’s, it
is ever so much smoother, as though the dog was wrapped in tight-fitting
satin. Each hair has a smaller diameter and tighter cuticle, and not
to put too fine a point on it, that is the finer point of type.
In some breeds, coat can be the difference between survival and death or fitness
for the job the dog was bred to do. In
others, it is window dressing but if you know Type, you must
give it a top five Priority rating.
The Sum of These Five Priorities?
Summarily
exclude
any dog that fails any two of these priorities. I say that because there are varying degrees of departure
from the utterly correct, even in these five areas.
If the dog acts like a duck and waddles a bit, it is wrong no matter
how beautiful its head, how perfect the structure, and how faultless its coat.
Judge each dog against the standard, not the
competition. You know that but in
the real world, if a dog catches your eye and excels in all but one of
these priorities while the competition is of average quality with no glaring
fault, which will you choose?
It is disappointing when you have to pick the “best of a bad
lot” and
astute judges
complain that it happens too often.
Is there a solution? Of course!! WITHHOLD ribbons. Be understanding,
offer to discuss your decisions but be firm when there is no above-average quality. In the long run, it is a kindness not to mislead the novice
into wasting more entry fees, or worse yet, taking the dog home to breed.
If you are certain in your knowledge, if you have applied the “Rule of Fives”
and found no dog you are comfortable with, then your duty is clear.
The reason you have before you dogs that lack Type is because
too many judges before you did not know or select for type.
Their lack of study and/or backbone has allowed breeders and handlers
to think you will just routinely give something in the ring the points.
Please.
Disappoint them.
from Judges' Seminar Guidebooks prepared by Barbara
(BJ) Andrews
|
